Cubic zirconia (abbreviated CZ) is an affordable diamond alternative that looks similar to real stones while remaining hypoallergenic and non-toxic.
CZ is often described as a stone of illumination, believed to stimulate and align your solar plexus chakra and help with making sound decisions when making important ones. This stone of wisdom also aids logical judgement and impartial conduct when making big decisions.
Farve
Cubic Zirconia (CZ) is one of the most widely available alternatives to diamond on the market today, thanks to its strikingly similar isometric crystal structure which gives it the appearance of real diamonds. Due to this similarity it can also be cut into various diamond shapes; however, cubic zirconia does have lower hardness ratings (8 on Mohs scale), lower refractive index and dispersion values than diamond, making it more vulnerable to abrasions and scratches over time.
Moissanite and cubic zirconia make great choices for those who want the beauty of diamonds without incurring the associated expenses. Both offer stunning optical properties at a fraction of their respective prices; yet each has unique physical traits.
Moissanite and cubic zirconia both come in an assortment of colors. However, high-grade moissanite often appears near colorless while cubic zirconia often features yellow or gray tints – this difference in appearance can greatly influence how jewelry appears overall.
Moissanite and cubic zirconia both boast significant environmental advantages. Produced in laboratories instead of mined directly from the earth, their impact is far lower on our natural world and they both serve as socially responsible options for eco-conscious shoppers.
Clarity
Moissanite and cubic zirconia both boast beautiful brilliance and fire, but moissanite is more durable. Moissanite also has less porous surfaces which resist oil-attracting dirt, helping it retain its brilliance longer than cubic zirconia – qualities which make moissanite an excellent choice for intricate jewelry designs as well as everyday wear.
Both gemstones are widely considered sustainable, ethical, and budget-friendly alternatives to natural diamonds and are an ideal option for those seeking something sustainable, ethical and budget-friendly. Boasting superior durability and fire, both gems are also conflict-free as they’re produced in laboratories instead of mined from the earth.
Moissanite derives its properties from meteorite minerals, giving it an air of celestial history and cosmic depth. Cubic zirconia was designed as an affordable diamond alternative. Both stones share many desirable optical characteristics similar to diamonds; thus the ultimate decision between these lab-created stones ultimately depends on personal preferences and budget considerations.
Hardness
Cubic zirconia, like moissanite, is an extremely hard diamond simulant that offers comparable hardness to natural diamonds. Both materials can be found in various jewelry styles ranging from earrings and wedding bands; however they have distinct physical characteristics that determine how long their sparkle and durability remain in tact.
Moissanite stands out with an outstanding rating of 9.25 on the Mohs scale, making it extremely durable and resistant to scratches. Furthermore, its higher refractive index allows it to reflect light more effectively than cubic zirconia while simultaneously shining superior.
Cubic zirconia stands out with a Mohs hardness rating between 8 to 8.5, meaning that it may not be as scratch resistant and therefore require additional care in terms of upkeep and cleaning to maintain its beauty.
Recently, some manufacturers have begun experimenting with coating cubic zirconia with a thin layer of diamond-like carbon (DLC), purportedly to increase its hardness and lustre. While this technique remains controversial and yet to be proved effective, it may provide another method for improving its aesthetic appearance.
Cubic zirconia and moissanite both offer great alternatives to diamond, but ultimately the decision between them should depend on personal preferences and budget considerations. For those who appreciate moissanite’s durability and longevity, the choice could lean toward this gemstone; conversely those seeking an economical option with similar fire and brilliance could opt for cubic zirconia instead.
Refraction
Moissanite and cubic zirconia are two popular diamond alternatives on the market, yet each offers distinct advantages and disadvantages. Moissanite stands out due to its higher hardness rating compared to cubic zirconia as well as superior heat resistance; making it more durable for everyday wear while offering greater radiance from its refractive index and fire. In the end, selecting between moissanite or cubic zirconia ultimately comes down to personal preferences and budget considerations.
Cubic zirconia, in comparison, is an affordable diamond substitute with similar optical properties and colors available to suit almost every budget. Produced by heating zirconium oxide with magnesium or calcium under high temperatures to produce different hues; doped with yttrium for additional hues; can be produced through other rare earth elements as well; it often used as a diamond simulant due to its superior optical properties and often having fewer inclusions than mined diamonds.
Cubic zirconia has a lower hardness rating than moissanite, making it more susceptible to scratches and damage over time. Furthermore, being less porous means it attracts oil and grime more readily requiring frequent cleaning sessions; nonetheless it remains more sustainable than natural diamonds that have negative environmental and socio-economic consequences when mined.
Danish 
English 
Swedish 
Dutch 
Finnish 
Norwegian